BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Gilligan — Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:34:06 -0600

Again, your post make VERY little sense.

Anyway, tell Joey and Karen we said hi and look forward to hanging out with them again.

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Tax Man — Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:17:01 -0600

well we shall see! And next time you talk to JV. You may want to ask him what happened to the guy that tried talking trash here. Poor guy has never been seen again at the course :) and he was at least 20 years younger and ......

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Gilligan — Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:06:23 -0600

Bob... you CLEARLY don't know me.

I'd suggest you ask someone who actually DOES and they will tell you that I am a VERY straight up guy.

I will say exactly what I say on here to anyone's face. This is something I have always been a firm believer in. I may say something about someone but it will always be something that I would say to there face.

Next time you guys are having a good laugh about a 6 month old post (please tell me you guys have better things to do than that)... tell Joey and Karen that Stacey and I said hello.

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Tax Man — Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:01:12 -0600

Gilligan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bob... trust me, I don't have to... you've laid it
> all out for us.
>

Just like you gossiping and telling lies about the local club here. If you only knew how much fun we have had here in Jax with that post. Most here in town think you should be wearing a dress and sipping tea.

> Again... If I am QUOTING someone it is POSSIBLE
> that that person SAID "F'n" versus saying the
> actual word. If I'm quoting Abe Lincoln I
> wouldn't say he said 87 years ago our
> forefathers.... I'd say Four score and 7 years
> ago... just like he did. Wouldn't you? Or do you
> just put words in people's mouth when you quote
> them? Again... you are just laying it all out
> there for us.

anything could be possible, but one thing is certain you have done nothing good for the SN and you continue to be nothing but a vagina! and we both know you would not have the balls to say half of the crap you say on here in person. And you can take that to the bank you kitty! the snac can not get here fast enough :)

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Gilligan — Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:08:42 -0600

Bob... trust me, I don't have to... you've laid it all out for us.

Again... If I am QUOTING someone it is POSSIBLE that that person SAID "F'n" versus saying the actual word. If I'm quoting Abe Lincoln I wouldn't say he said 87 years ago our forefathers.... I'd say Four score and 7 years ago... just like he did. Wouldn't you? Or do you just put words in people's mouth when you quote them? Again... you are just laying it all out there for us.

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

jtolbert — Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:18:14 -0600

Tax Man Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And to think a lot of folks thought you where
> going to be a good BOD member.

Thanks! Honestly, Bob, I've gotten to a point where I can't take every post seriously if they're laced with insults and generalities. I want to hear opinions, advice, recommendations, etc. However, when a post is laced with unverifiable generalities and insults, I won't give it all of my attention. So, I'll just continue to accept everything with a smile and take it as a compliment.

> So Justin, are you
> saying it is ok to use letters to circumvent the
> filter? WE all know what he meant, otherwise like
> others have pointed out, he would have just used
> the actual word no matter who said it.

The use of "f'n" was already voted on and established. It can represent something other than the f-bomb. Also, nothing about my post said people were allowed to circumvent the filter. Also, this is the comment that MY post was in reference to: "Again is the bod planning on allowing the use of letters to convey something? If so I see it as open season!" You mention nothing about circumvention. You may use all the letters you want to convey something. In fact, we're all doing that right now! Just be sure to not string the letters into a pattern that is profane.

> Just want to know if everyone is now allowed to
> do so; Or just BOD members?

Everybody can use it. It was already voted on when somebody ELSE used it. Also, people have used "wtf" and "lmao" without repercussions.

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Tax Man — Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:11:29 -0600

jtolbert Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Don't forget your stamps!

And to think a lot of folks thought you where going to be a good BOD member. So Justin, are you saying it is ok to use letters to circumvent the filter? WE all know what he meant, otherwise like others have pointed out, he would have just used the actual word no matter who said it.

Just want to know if everyone is now allowed to do so; Or just BOD members?

And Gilly, never question my character punk! Always trying to turn things around on people. Your golf game is like you, a cartoon character:)

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Gilligan — Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:38:51 -0600

LOL... Bob... yeah, I am a creative GENIUS and completely made up that dialog.

Whatever man... the man that thinks that is likely the case (especially given the source... I don't lie) is revealing a huge part of his character.

Funny thing is that I actually verified what he thought the "H" stood for because I kept thinking it was "Hank" but knew it wasn't right. <--- oh no, more depth to the "lie"... I'm maniacal!!!

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

jtolbert — Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:32:09 -0600

Don't forget your stamps!

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Tax Man — Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:29:44 -0600

Gilligan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What "lie" are you possibly claiming that I have
> told?

the one about your BIL and your maid, but again I could care less about you. And please spare us from your rebutal as you are a complete waste of time and I repeat YOU have done nothing good for the SN what so ever!

Again is the bod planning on allowing the use of letters to convey something? If so I see it as open season!

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Gilligan — Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:18:29 -0600

What "lie" are you possibly claiming that I have told?

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

jtolbert — Thu, 17 Feb 2011 07:43:15 -0600

Your dog has an outstanding vocabulary!

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Tax Man — Thu, 17 Feb 2011 07:27:17 -0600

Gilligan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Justin, or apparently like a 16 year old school
> girl does in her text messages.
>
> Oops, I did that all wrong... was supposed to use
> a bunch of U's R's and 2's

Thanks richard cranium for being that guy! And for opening the forum up for using letters to circumvent the filter and then telling a lie to justify it! The BOD like the SN has become a F n joke. And my dog said that remark so you have no clue what the f stands for!

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Gilligan — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:44:41 -0600

Justin, or apparently like a 16 year old school girl does in her text messages.

Oops, I did that all wrong... was supposed to use a bunch of U's R's and 2's

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

jtolbert — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:35:59 -0600

Tax Man Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As gilly would say classy

Thanks! Maybe I should get a monocle like Mr. Peanut and start speaking with a French accent!

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Keith Bodin — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:05:53 -0600

Sorry Lesliez I didn't mean to side track the thread....

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

lesliez — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:52:13 -0600

Members Present: Leslie Easterling, Josh Lenox, Jamie Massengle, Kevin Richard, Justin Tolbert (entered at 8:30pm)
Started at 8:05pm

Forum Guidelines
* Banning period for violation has been changed to:
1st time- 30 days
2nd time- 90 days
3rd time- 6 months
4th time- 1 year
(Passes 4-0)
* After a ban is expired, the user will be placed on a 90 day probationary period. If the forum user violates a guideline while in the probationary period, the user is subject to the next level of banishment without warning. (Passes 4-0)
* Terry Zeringue was sent a warning for violation of guideline #1. (Passes 4-0)
* Decided f'n isn't in violation of guidelines (Passes 5-0). Could represent "Freakin" or "Flippin".
* Discussed moving posts from "General Discussion" ,that are not tournament related, to "Off Topic" Discussion.

Financials
* Discussed putting financial reports on google doc.
* Josh agreed to post financials quarterly.
* Josh posted them on Saturday, and will again in March.

Handbook/ By-Laws
* Discussed splitting handbook into by-laws and a TD handbook.
* Need a lawyer? Discussed contacting Rob Williams and Bryan Griffin.
* Justin received a copy of Memphis' by-laws and we will be using them as a reference and starting point. We will be looking through them, and discuss them at next meeting.
* A BoD member will be contacting Rob and Bryan.

Next Meeting Agenda
* By-Laws
* Website
* 2012 Championships
* Bag Tag Promotion

Meeting adjourned at 9:30pm.

Sorry! Just trying to get it back on topic.

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Tax Man — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:29:26 -0600

Gilligan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What IS funny is that when I see Bob has posted on
> a thread I know that there is surely going to be
> post that make very little sense in that thread.
>
> Thanks for being that guy Bob.

Kind of like your 7383 posts! And good try on defending your use of Fn. Very classy Gilly! What say you rest of the BOD? and gilly thanks for always being the Richard Cranium in every thread )

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Gilligan — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:07:54 -0600

What IS funny is that when I see Bob has posted on a thread I know that there is surely going to be post that make very little sense in that thread.

Thanks for being that guy Bob.

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Tax Man — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:16:05 -0600

jtolbert Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tax Man Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I and the rest of the SN are laughing at what a
> > joke the BOD has become. He got caught again
> and
> > now the double standard is once again
> implemented.
>
> At least there's some comic relief, eh?
As gilly would say classy

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

jtolbert — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:47:45 -0600

Tax Man Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I and the rest of the SN are laughing at what a
> joke the BOD has become. He got caught again and
> now the double standard is once again implemented.

At least there's some comic relief, eh?

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Tax Man — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:43:45 -0600

jtolbert Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't know whether or not to laugh...

I and the rest of the SN are laughing at what a joke the BOD has become. He got caught again and now the double standard is once again implemented.

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

jtolbert — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:39:20 -0600

I don't know whether or not to laugh...

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Gilligan — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:37:05 -0600

Rob Williams Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not really. It obviously means the bad word,
> since freakin', flippin' (or whatever euphemism)
> could have been written out. The use of the word
> "retarded" is also becoming unacceptable among
> some in polite company. Watch out for that
> slippery slope ...

A. I was quoting him... you don't know if he said "effin" or any other actual word that was mentioned.
B. He has down-syndrome... he can say "retarded" all he wants. He functions at a super high level and is wittier than most of you guys and could probably smoke all of you in a game of DVD Scene-It. Look for him in the new Bruce Willis movie "Loopers" coming out in a year or so.

Funny story, when he used to play softball in the Special Olympics he would get so frustrated at the other players because they couldn't function as highly as he could and he would yell at them "Come on guys! You are all playing like a bunch of retards!"

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

jtolbert — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:52:21 -0600

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Rob Williams — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:33:45 -0600

Not really. It obviously means the bad word, since freakin', flippin' (or whatever euphemism) could have been written out. The use of the word "retarded" is also becoming unacceptable among some in polite company. Watch out for that slippery slope ...

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Dillon Gourley — Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:13:58 -0600

or freakin'..

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Bolty-Bolt — Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:57:09 -0600

Could stand for flippin' though...

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Keith Bodin — Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:00:23 -0600

Gilligan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> My Bro-in-law has down-syndrom... this is a fact
> of his life.
>
> What does it say about you though that he makes
> more sense even in his most incoherent times than
> you do in your post.
>
> Careful who you claim is "normal".
>
> Or as he would say "I may have down-syndrom but
> that guy is F'n retarded!"

I bet you a dollar to a donut that F'n in that phrase does not stand for fricken......LOL

Re: BoD Minutes 2/2/11

Gilligan — Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:26:14 -0600

My Bro-in-law has down-syndrom... this is a fact of his life.

What does it say about you though that he makes more sense even in his most incoherent times than you do in your post.

Careful who you claim is "normal".

Or as he would say "I may have down-syndrom but that guy is F'n retarded!"