Alabama •
Arkansas •
Florida •
Georgia •
Kentucky •
Louisiana •
Mississippi •
Oklahoma •
Tennessee •
Texas
Welcome!
» Log In
» Create A New Profile
Serious Question on Eligibility
Posted by ww
|
Re: Serious Question on Eligibility August 21, 2008 03:46PM |
Quote
John K
Honestly Bob you are the only person saying that the SN fees should go somewhere other than the division they played in the sn qualifier.
John k
lol, I was the first person to tell the pDGA that the mag should be optional ;o]
Now it is!
I was also the one that suggested ordering directly and getting the baskets for the host.
It just makes sense. If a player is competing where he did not put money in makes no sense. If the money is elsewhere so should the player.
Take a vote!
|
Re: Serious Question on Eligibility August 22, 2008 12:58PM |
Quote
bazkitcase5
so you would be punishing players who could have played masters all year, but played "up" into the open division, thus giving money to the open division for pro championships - money they won't even be playing for at the championship, because they are now going to play masters
No, Bob is say if allowed to play OPEN, then put his $2 in the OPEN division, not the Masters division.
Terry Zeringue
|
Re: Serious Question on Eligibility August 22, 2008 02:19PM |
What DON just posted is another type of Bagging,,, the "Hide in a protected division unless I think I can win" bagging.
Terry Zeringue
Terry Zeringue
|
Re: Serious Question on Eligibility August 22, 2008 04:40PM |
once again there where ample masters players at every event he played so, he had the option and chose open not masters. now he is wanting to play in the other disison. if he is allowed then his money/fees should go with him. If not why should he be allowd to play without putting in?
Does that not make sense?
Can we take a vote?
Does that not make sense?
Can we take a vote?
|
Re: Serious Question on Eligibility August 22, 2008 07:12PM |
and Judy is correct, if there are not enough for the divison{which is not the case with this person} then they need to ask for there money to be allocated to the divison in which they intend to play in the SNPC. Otherwise they are taking where they did not put in.
Now there are players showing up with points in masters that did not even play masters all year?? They are showing points that they earned in open? But another is showing no points which is how many masters points he has? Once again there money is in open not masters.
I do not understand how this can be any different then me being told that my masters points{even thou I had not cashed} could not be used to play advanced in the SNAC.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 08/22/2008 07:43PM by Tax Man.
Now there are players showing up with points in masters that did not even play masters all year?? They are showing points that they earned in open? But another is showing no points which is how many masters points he has? Once again there money is in open not masters.
I do not understand how this can be any different then me being told that my masters points{even thou I had not cashed} could not be used to play advanced in the SNAC.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 08/22/2008 07:43PM by Tax Man.
|
Re: Serious Question on Eligibility August 23, 2008 01:55AM |
if an 40+ year old can hang with everyone else in the OPEN division, then why hide behind the age protected division??????? Is it because he might not win because Matto, Fowler, etc is playing????? Why won't an Adv player that is kicking @ss moving up??? Because he doesn't believe he can't beat those people? Is this not the same thing???
Pro Master should be for the EX PROS that have lost a little bit because of their age. It shouldn't be for the ones who can still hang with the big dogs,, but now have an option because they are old enough. The winner of this years PRO Worlds in the PRO Masters division would of tied for 15th out of 145 players with AVERY JENKINS!!!!!! He can hang,, but he knew he can win more money in the age protected division,,,,,,same thing as ADV and INT does!!!! They stay down because they realize they can win more prizes if they stay in the lower division. WillyBT decides on which division to play by guessing the payout of the two divisions.
Terry Zeringue
Pro Master should be for the EX PROS that have lost a little bit because of their age. It shouldn't be for the ones who can still hang with the big dogs,, but now have an option because they are old enough. The winner of this years PRO Worlds in the PRO Masters division would of tied for 15th out of 145 players with AVERY JENKINS!!!!!! He can hang,, but he knew he can win more money in the age protected division,,,,,,same thing as ADV and INT does!!!! They stay down because they realize they can win more prizes if they stay in the lower division. WillyBT decides on which division to play by guessing the payout of the two divisions.
Terry Zeringue
|
Re: Serious Question on Eligibility August 23, 2008 03:31PM |
Yes Clayton! but there is an easy fix. I was told NO and so should they. Unless of course there fees move to the correct divison. Otherwise they should play OPEN!
|
Re: Serious Question on Eligibility August 25, 2008 06:32AM |
Quote
dangerousdon
Ditto to what Judy posted about having your points placed where you ask, in case there are not enough players for your division.
what about your cash? It appears you no longer even need a point to play masters or grandmasters. Not sure why;[
|
Re: Serious Question on Eligibility August 25, 2008 01:22PM |
Quote
dangerousdon
This is truly a case of: "something is broken and it needs to be fixed".
well I am trying but no board member wishes to say anything.
|
Re: Serious Question on Eligibility August 25, 2008 03:27PM |
Quote
John K
Nice blanket statement... I've already stated that I don't think anything is broken. I disagree with you in regards to having the money follow the individual instead of the division. That is just creating work in my opinion and would just cause confusion
John k
well the other posters think it is. I know you directed the answer at me but I am not the only one who feels this way. as for the confusion, why if the player does not have a point in a divison they cannot play there. It was fairly simple at the SNAC and should be at the SNPC. If they have not put in then they should not be able to take from it. Once again I say have an open vote and see if people think it is broke. I see a few others that agree.
as for the am players, they also should need a point{in the open divison} and most of the ones who are planning on coming do so.
it is at least something the BOD should consider. they should also consider allowing players with pro points that have not cashed to be allowed to play in the snac. one for all and all for one;o]~
|
Re: Serious Question on Eligibility August 25, 2008 04:06PM |
Quote
John K
3 people still don't constitute a majority :) But if other people feel that same way chime in...
Am needing pro points, that was the way it USE to be and was changed 3 years ago to allow anyone with sn poinst to play in the SNPC, but that doesn't work the other way Bob...
It does if you are on the BOD!!!
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
Guests:
16
Record Number of Users:
19
on January 14, 2013
Record Number of Guests:
244
on February 20, 2013