Alabama •
Arkansas •
Florida •
Georgia •
Kentucky •
Louisiana •
Mississippi •
Oklahoma •
Tennessee •
Texas
Welcome!
» Log In
» Create A New Profile
SN Financial 2010
Posted by Hilltopper
|
Re: SN Financial 2010 September 17, 2010 08:22PM |
.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/17/2010 08:25PM by Tax Man.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/17/2010 08:25PM by Tax Man.
|
Re: SN Financial 2010 September 17, 2010 08:24PM |
Hilltopper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yes, it does include shipping. I'll look up
> exactly what the price was but using my immediate
> math skills I would say bout $4 per tag more or
> less. We put the tags up for bid every year and
> accept the lowest bid.
>
> Josh
sell the tags to the series, they retail for $3.50 ea. / as a sponsorship I deduct 20%........so they cost the series $2.80 ea. (probably 2.85 to 2.90 counting shipping), hit me up if your club/group needs any bag tags - this is my 3rd year doing them for the SN, I have also done MADGA's, Kansas City, Official Ice Bowl, Little Rock, Tulsa, USDGC..........and many more
Evan McKee
Trophies Unlimited
479-783-6634 (M-F 8-5 cst)
ttctu@sbcglobal.net
Did you all order more then 100?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yes, it does include shipping. I'll look up
> exactly what the price was but using my immediate
> math skills I would say bout $4 per tag more or
> less. We put the tags up for bid every year and
> accept the lowest bid.
>
> Josh
sell the tags to the series, they retail for $3.50 ea. / as a sponsorship I deduct 20%........so they cost the series $2.80 ea. (probably 2.85 to 2.90 counting shipping), hit me up if your club/group needs any bag tags - this is my 3rd year doing them for the SN, I have also done MADGA's, Kansas City, Official Ice Bowl, Little Rock, Tulsa, USDGC..........and many more
Evan McKee
Trophies Unlimited
479-783-6634 (M-F 8-5 cst)
ttctu@sbcglobal.net
Did you all order more then 100?
|
Re: SN Financial 2010 September 17, 2010 08:31PM |
8/20/10 Memphis Disc Golf (BOD sponsorship to offset PDGA fees): $500
Did the BOD come out of pocket with this? Or was it from the 25 cent slush fund? If so it should read PLAYERS sponsorship and they should have had an exemption to the SNAC :)))))
Thanks for posting the numbers!
Did the BOD come out of pocket with this? Or was it from the 25 cent slush fund? If so it should read PLAYERS sponsorship and they should have had an exemption to the SNAC :)))))
Thanks for posting the numbers!
|
Re: SN Financial 2010 September 18, 2010 05:10AM |
Hilltopper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The original order is for 150-200. Plus women's
> tags. Some tags cost more than others. We ordered
> 100 more. in midseason as memory serves. Again I
> can look up the exact numbers if you want.
>
> Josh
Josh, I posted the numbers that Evan says he charges. 2.90 each with shipping so 100x2.90=290 not 405.89 that is why I asked if you ordered more then 100. And who did you send the check to???
-------------------------------------------------------
> The original order is for 150-200. Plus women's
> tags. Some tags cost more than others. We ordered
> 100 more. in midseason as memory serves. Again I
> can look up the exact numbers if you want.
>
> Josh
Josh, I posted the numbers that Evan says he charges. 2.90 each with shipping so 100x2.90=290 not 405.89 that is why I asked if you ordered more then 100. And who did you send the check to???
|
Re: SN Financial 2010 September 18, 2010 05:12AM |
Hilltopper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tax Man Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 8/20/10 Memphis Disc Golf (BOD sponsorship to
> > offset PDGA fees): $500
> >
> > Did the BOD come out of pocket with this? Or
> was
> > it from the 25 cent slush fund? If so it should
> > read PLAYERS sponsorship and they should have
> had
> > an exemption to the SNAC :)))))
> >
> > Thanks for posting the numbers!
>
> 25 cent "slush fund." That "slush fund" also pays
> for the end of the year trophies, points discs,
> shipping fees (although I just paid for shipping
> out of pocket mostly), and provides us with a
> reserve fund.
>
> Josh
I know what it is for , but you said BOD sponsor so I thought it was the BOD money and not the PLAYERS slush fund
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tax Man Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 8/20/10 Memphis Disc Golf (BOD sponsorship to
> > offset PDGA fees): $500
> >
> > Did the BOD come out of pocket with this? Or
> was
> > it from the 25 cent slush fund? If so it should
> > read PLAYERS sponsorship and they should have
> had
> > an exemption to the SNAC :)))))
> >
> > Thanks for posting the numbers!
>
> 25 cent "slush fund." That "slush fund" also pays
> for the end of the year trophies, points discs,
> shipping fees (although I just paid for shipping
> out of pocket mostly), and provides us with a
> reserve fund.
>
> Josh
I know what it is for , but you said BOD sponsor so I thought it was the BOD money and not the PLAYERS slush fund
|
Re: SN Financial 2010 September 18, 2010 05:13AM |
Gilligan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Did you all order more then 100?"
>
> If not then we are really stupid because Jim just
> posted a pic of tag # 130 or so.
You said it not me. Obviously someone dropped the ball cause 161 did not get sold or that is the story at this point lol
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Did you all order more then 100?"
>
> If not then we are really stupid because Jim just
> posted a pic of tag # 130 or so.
You said it not me. Obviously someone dropped the ball cause 161 did not get sold or that is the story at this point lol
|
Re: SN Financial 2010 September 18, 2010 12:57PM |
Gilligan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bob, you are just making up your own facts and
> changing the line of questioning so nothing can
> ever get answered.
What am I making up? The numbers are the ones Evan posted for the cost of the tags. 161 is the number of bag tags that where not sold, that is also using the number the SNPC was paid forJosh said the first order was paid for from last year. And The only other question that i was First to ask was who did he make the check out to? Ex: Evan, Kevin....
although your question, was already answered by Josh! he said 150-200
"Did you all order more then 100?"
If not then we are really stupid because Jim just posted a pic of tag # 130 or so.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bob, you are just making up your own facts and
> changing the line of questioning so nothing can
> ever get answered.
What am I making up? The numbers are the ones Evan posted for the cost of the tags. 161 is the number of bag tags that where not sold, that is also using the number the SNPC was paid forJosh said the first order was paid for from last year. And The only other question that i was First to ask was who did he make the check out to? Ex: Evan, Kevin....
although your question, was already answered by Josh! he said 150-200
"Did you all order more then 100?"
If not then we are really stupid because Jim just posted a pic of tag # 130 or so.
|
Re: SN Financial 2010 September 18, 2010 03:49PM |
Gilligan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The quote bob used was from this years bid so I
> assumed if he's quoting this years quote he would
> be using that in reference to this years
>
> This is when I realized he was just putting
> together whatever he wanted to use (this years tag
> quote and using it against last years actual
> prices) and suggesting there is a problem with a
> discrepancy.
Gilly you are correct.
. Voted to accept Evan McKee's bid to make the 2009-2010 bag tags for $4 a piece. (FYI: The bid was not for $2.30 as stated on another forum due to an increase in pricing from last year.)
I see where my first search pulled the 2.30, but then found this where it explains the 4 dollars. Glad he is now back to 2.90.
Josh, sorry and thanks for posting the numbers!
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 09/18/2010 04:03PM by Tax Man.
-------------------------------------------------------
> The quote bob used was from this years bid so I
> assumed if he's quoting this years quote he would
> be using that in reference to this years
>
> This is when I realized he was just putting
> together whatever he wanted to use (this years tag
> quote and using it against last years actual
> prices) and suggesting there is a problem with a
> discrepancy.
Gilly you are correct.
. Voted to accept Evan McKee's bid to make the 2009-2010 bag tags for $4 a piece. (FYI: The bid was not for $2.30 as stated on another forum due to an increase in pricing from last year.)
I see where my first search pulled the 2.30, but then found this where it explains the 4 dollars. Glad he is now back to 2.90.
Josh, sorry and thanks for posting the numbers!
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 09/18/2010 04:03PM by Tax Man.
|
Re: SN Financial 2010 September 20, 2010 02:45PM |
JIM ORUM Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ladies get two tags if I remember right that may
> be where some of the missing tags are. Jim!
I thought ladies tags where free? and do they have numbers on them? and 88 are missing
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ladies get two tags if I remember right that may
> be where some of the missing tags are. Jim!
I thought ladies tags where free? and do they have numbers on them? and 88 are missing
|
Re: SN Financial 2010 September 21, 2010 05:36AM |
Keith Bodin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I know when you sell a tag to a lady she get 2, 1
> for the SN and 1 for SN ladies tags, but I think
> we still have to buy them....Yes they do have
> numbers on them.
I knew the answer Sunshine! But I am also curious how many where bought. For every womens tag sold the profit for the series is 14 dollars. As Evan said he sells them @ 2.90 so 2@3=6-20=14
To claim this is where the 161 tags went is just a way to try and hide what has realy happened as we still have 88 unaccounted for. And from the look of Jims picture I see no womens tag in the picture.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I know when you sell a tag to a lady she get 2, 1
> for the SN and 1 for SN ladies tags, but I think
> we still have to buy them....Yes they do have
> numbers on them.
I knew the answer Sunshine! But I am also curious how many where bought. For every womens tag sold the profit for the series is 14 dollars. As Evan said he sells them @ 2.90 so 2@3=6-20=14
To claim this is where the 161 tags went is just a way to try and hide what has realy happened as we still have 88 unaccounted for. And from the look of Jims picture I see no womens tag in the picture.
|
Re: SN Financial 2010 September 27, 2010 02:41PM |
anyone?? Bueller???
|
Re: SN Financial 2010 September 27, 2010 10:07PM |
Come on Boba, didn't you see where Jim solved the mystery? The 14 missing tags were in Little Rock.
|
Re: SN Financial 2010 September 28, 2010 06:21AM |
Bluff Magee Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> [m2.wnymedia.net]
> dy.gif
>
> Come on Boba, didn't you see where Jim solved the
> mystery? The 14 missing tags were in Little Rock.
no 25 where in LR and only 14 sold. they where sent to Hogman who $eem$ to be awol right now????
-------------------------------------------------------
> [m2.wnymedia.net]
> dy.gif
>
> Come on Boba, didn't you see where Jim solved the
> mystery? The 14 missing tags were in Little Rock.
no 25 where in LR and only 14 sold. they where sent to Hogman who $eem$ to be awol right now????
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.