Alabama •
Arkansas •
Florida •
Georgia •
Kentucky •
Louisiana •
Mississippi •
Oklahoma •
Tennessee •
Texas
Welcome!
» Log In
» Create A New Profile
Board Minutes 9/29/10
Posted by lesliez
|
Re: Board Minutes 9/29/10 October 11, 2010 03:15PM |
Wow, what a complete JOKE!$!$! The man says get someone else to handle it, and the BOD does nothing!!! Yall couldn't wait to jack up the sponsor exemption price, but you all did nothing to find the mi$$ing funds. Very Sad indeed!
|
Re: Board Minutes 9/29/10 October 12, 2010 07:26AM |
Russ3523 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bob, you seem to have a lot of free time, maybe
> you should volunteer to be a "special prosecutor"
> of sorts and investigate this incident. I'm sure
> ragging the BoD volunteers will really convince
> them to dive into it. ;-) just sayin'
>
> rWc3523
well RWC, it is sad to see the BOD not change the one thing that is for sure broken!!! I do not want to have to rag anyone, but they said give them till this meeting. Then they do nothing and let the person who FUBAR'ed it continue to handle the sales of tags even though HE himself said to get someone else to do it.
And seriously RWC, Bluff was spot on when he said it would be swept under the rug. I suppose I was at least hoping they would have someone else handle it in the future. Just FACTS!!!!!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bob, you seem to have a lot of free time, maybe
> you should volunteer to be a "special prosecutor"
> of sorts and investigate this incident. I'm sure
> ragging the BoD volunteers will really convince
> them to dive into it. ;-) just sayin'
>
> rWc3523
well RWC, it is sad to see the BOD not change the one thing that is for sure broken!!! I do not want to have to rag anyone, but they said give them till this meeting. Then they do nothing and let the person who FUBAR'ed it continue to handle the sales of tags even though HE himself said to get someone else to do it.
And seriously RWC, Bluff was spot on when he said it would be swept under the rug. I suppose I was at least hoping they would have someone else handle it in the future. Just FACTS!!!!!
|
Re: Board Minutes 9/29/10 October 12, 2010 08:38AM |
lesliez Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We discussed giving someone else the
> responsibility...but you all know it is not up to
> a couple. Majoirty rules! I brought up the few
> that volunteered and will continue to discuss this
> issue. We didn't vote on anything just discussed
> it. The key is...getting the majority to
> agree...
>
> Leslie
.
Thanks for that insight! Can I ask who it was that was not in favor of turning it over to someone else? As that makes no sense what so ever. And I hope those that did not want to assign it to someone else know where all of the tags are that have already been sold.
Thanks again Leslie!!!!!
-------------------------------------------------------
> We discussed giving someone else the
> responsibility...but you all know it is not up to
> a couple. Majoirty rules! I brought up the few
> that volunteered and will continue to discuss this
> issue. We didn't vote on anything just discussed
> it. The key is...getting the majority to
> agree...
>
> Leslie
.
Thanks for that insight! Can I ask who it was that was not in favor of turning it over to someone else? As that makes no sense what so ever. And I hope those that did not want to assign it to someone else know where all of the tags are that have already been sold.
Thanks again Leslie!!!!!
|
Re: Board Minutes 9/29/10 October 12, 2010 09:32AM |
"Showing ones hand" is already not happening. Need proof
[www.sndg.org]
Several voted on issues with all 6 BOD members present and no ownership of votes.
Where's the transparency?
JABBA
it MUST be the plastic
[www.sndg.org]
Several voted on issues with all 6 BOD members present and no ownership of votes.
Where's the transparency?
JABBA
it MUST be the plastic
|
Re: Board Minutes 9/29/10 October 12, 2010 09:35AM |
Gilligan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Agreed... no sense in putting up there how you are
> "feeling" or "leaning" at this point. Once the
> vote is done then I feel everyone should "show
> their hand".
Thanks Gilly! I just hope that BOD members know that they serve the players and personal feelings should be checked at the door. And they should know that it was reasons like this that the BOD and Treasurer where created.
Sidebottom, not sure why as HE has said get someone else to do it. And nothing against him or the BOD, but this problem needs fixing asap as last years tags are still not accounted for.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Agreed... no sense in putting up there how you are
> "feeling" or "leaning" at this point. Once the
> vote is done then I feel everyone should "show
> their hand".
Thanks Gilly! I just hope that BOD members know that they serve the players and personal feelings should be checked at the door. And they should know that it was reasons like this that the BOD and Treasurer where created.
Sidebottom, not sure why as HE has said get someone else to do it. And nothing against him or the BOD, but this problem needs fixing asap as last years tags are still not accounted for.
|
Re: Board Minutes 9/29/10 October 12, 2010 11:41AM |
Gilligan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > Several voted on issues with all 6 BOD members
> present and no ownership of votes.
>
>
> Why can't we at least get the details right.
>
> Actually there were NO votes where all 6 were
> there. I was late and missed just about all of
> the meeting. 4-1 was the only non-unanimous vote.
> I imagine whoever voted against it would speak up
> if asked. I know I would. Everyone should
> because no one should be ashamed of how they voted
> on a topic or maybe they know they shouldn't have
> voted that way.
why should we have to ask? Votes should become part of the meeting minutes..just sayin
JABBA
it MUST be the plastic
-------------------------------------------------------
> > Several voted on issues with all 6 BOD members
> present and no ownership of votes.
>
>
> Why can't we at least get the details right.
>
> Actually there were NO votes where all 6 were
> there. I was late and missed just about all of
> the meeting. 4-1 was the only non-unanimous vote.
> I imagine whoever voted against it would speak up
> if asked. I know I would. Everyone should
> because no one should be ashamed of how they voted
> on a topic or maybe they know they shouldn't have
> voted that way.
why should we have to ask? Votes should become part of the meeting minutes..just sayin
JABBA
it MUST be the plastic
|
Re: Board Minutes 9/29/10 October 12, 2010 12:31PM |
mike sidebottom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> great point doug
[www.youtube.com]
-------------------------------------------------------
> great point doug
[www.youtube.com]
|
Re: Board Minutes 9/29/10 October 12, 2010 12:47PM |
Well that person should not be on bod. I would like to know if the ones I voted for have the same opinions about certain subjects as I do in case they run again in the future. I'll leave that runon sentence as is.
Terry Zeringue
Terry Zeringue
|
Re: Board Minutes 9/29/10 October 12, 2010 01:32PM |
YO YO maybe I could givezome much needed DOUGIE lesson$ for CRUNCH and DILLON????
Step 1 GO PLAY IN DA STREET!!!
HA that's freakin hilarious TAXMAN
JABBA
it MUST be the plastic
Step 1 GO PLAY IN DA STREET!!!
HA that's freakin hilarious TAXMAN
JABBA
it MUST be the plastic
|
Re: Board Minutes 9/29/10 October 12, 2010 06:41PM |
Jeez Louise. it's not hard to understand.
The Board members desire secrecy like any bank robbers do.
I'm really starting to think the Great Bag Tag Heist of 2010 was an inside job, and the treasurer let poor old Jim O take the rap. After all, the treasurer admitted on the stand he didn't keep a record of who gave him money for the tags.
Way to take the rap, Jim O. Thanks for playing such a fun part in this mystery novel that has more surprises than Gilligan's tranny affairs.
And now a poem.
Don't shed a tear
Because every year
SN funds just disappear
Nothing to see here
The Board members desire secrecy like any bank robbers do.
I'm really starting to think the Great Bag Tag Heist of 2010 was an inside job, and the treasurer let poor old Jim O take the rap. After all, the treasurer admitted on the stand he didn't keep a record of who gave him money for the tags.
Way to take the rap, Jim O. Thanks for playing such a fun part in this mystery novel that has more surprises than Gilligan's tranny affairs.
And now a poem.
Don't shed a tear
Because every year
SN funds just disappear
Nothing to see here
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
Guests:
20
Record Number of Users:
19
on January 14, 2013
Record Number of Guests:
244
on February 20, 2013