Alabama   •   Arkansas   •   Florida   •   Georgia   •   Kentucky   •   Louisiana   •   Mississippi   •   Oklahoma   •   Tennessee   •   Texas
Welcome! » Log In » Create A New Profile

Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting

Posted by jtolbert 
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 08, 2012 08:55PM
I believe the rules state's that a player wanting to retain there am status can except prizes, instead of the cash prize they would have won in open once every six months. So Bob & Bill can except the trophies with no worries, and so could there friend who wants to move back down to Adv. Because the trophy is a prize not cash. To help his argument he can say that excepting said trophy was his once for the next six months. Hope that helped with your problem Joey.
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 08, 2012 08:59PM
That is not a lawyer answer J.N.....so your response is not correct.....Sorry try again!

___________________________________________________________________________
Keith "Sunshine" B.
Rumble in Ragley, version 1.0
15 November 2014
Field limited to 90 players
[www.facebook.com]
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 08, 2012 09:22PM
It may not have been a lawyer response. But you really shouldn't need a lawyer to figure it out. Just common sense!
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 08, 2012 09:26PM
LOL and there in-lies the problem.....

___________________________________________________________________________
Keith "Sunshine" B.
Rumble in Ragley, version 1.0
15 November 2014
Field limited to 90 players
[www.facebook.com]
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 08, 2012 09:36PM
Yeah no kidding! LOL
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 08, 2012 09:49PM
We already covered Bob and Bill. They are still Ams. 1.2.1. Joey's Pro apparently wants to be reclassified, so the prizes in lieu rule is irrelevant to his situation. 1.3.1. You're mixing up the stay up and the move down rules. You're also not getting how the prizes in lieu rule works, but that is immaterial to the status of these example players.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 05/08/2012 10:06PM by Discjazz.
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 09, 2012 09:21AM
If a lawyer didn't right the rules then a lawyers interpretation could be wrong :).....So, say i lose 3 tournaments, on the last one i win, i accept plastic instead of cash and it has a trophy additionally added....i have to deny the trophy and accept the few hundred dollars worth of plastic to become an am again?(or of course deny everything)
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 09, 2012 09:59AM
deny deny deny and when caught deny again!

___________________________________________________________________________
Keith "Sunshine" B.
Rumble in Ragley, version 1.0
15 November 2014
Field limited to 90 players
[www.facebook.com]
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 09, 2012 10:17AM
Thanks, Greg Williams!

And
Quote
Dustin
If a lawyer didn't right the rules then a lawyers interpretation could be wrong

You know it's write, right?
Example: I did not write the rules.
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 09, 2012 10:56AM
Yes, Wayne, I just typed it fast and wasn't paying attention but I am pretty sure that everyone that read it, understood what I was trying to say.

MassiveJ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks, Greg Williams!
>
> And
> If a lawyer didn't right the rules then a lawyers
> interpretation could be wrong
>
> You know it's write, right?
> Example: I did not write the rules.
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 09, 2012 11:28AM
Oh I understood it. That doesn't make it write(right).

Jamie "Massive J" Massengale
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 09, 2012 11:31AM
I am sorry for the typo......
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 09, 2012 11:39AM
I like these guys. They are funny guys.

[www.youtube.com]
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 09, 2012 12:28PM
WTH? Bunch of haters. That is my oppinion! LMBO
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 09, 2012 01:36PM
Don't worry about it, Dustin. I was just giving you @#$%&.


Jamie "Massive J" Massengale
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 15, 2012 01:01PM
I don't think you can except prizes....you can however accept them...
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 15, 2012 02:53PM
JN used the wrong word (except). However even if he had used the word we know was intended (accept) the comment still would not have made sense under the rules, common or otherwise.

Since this thread has zombied back up I'll offer again my Seven Snippets in the hope it might help some understand the new rules:

If you win you may have to stay up. 1.2.
Pros only have to stay up if they take cash or the equivalent. 1.2.1
Typically trophies are not cash or the equivalent. 1.2.1
If you lose 4 you may be able to move down. 1.3.
If you take an award for your final score you did not lose. 1.3
You can't move down to Rec, but you can stay there as long as a TD allows. 1.2.4.4
If you're a bagger the TD can make you move up. 1.6.

<[www.sndg.org];
Anonymous User
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 20, 2012 11:10AM
If this man ^ and trackin01 with a dab of Bluff Magee and John K, all the work he does on the BOD we would have ourselves a real series.
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 20, 2012 03:19PM
That was almost a real sentence....almost.
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 20, 2012 07:15PM
hobbit489 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That was almost a real sentence....almost.


LOL @#$%& PHds..... Give them a degree and they know everything....lol

___________________________________________________________________________
Keith "Sunshine" B.
Rumble in Ragley, version 1.0
15 November 2014
Field limited to 90 players
[www.facebook.com]
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 21, 2012 12:17PM
Nope, I was this way before. Now my opinions are just viewed as slightly more pompous. ;)
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 21, 2012 12:20PM
LOL

___________________________________________________________________________
Keith "Sunshine" B.
Rumble in Ragley, version 1.0
15 November 2014
Field limited to 90 players
[www.facebook.com]
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
May 21, 2012 06:41PM
If by "real series" Dillon means one with competitive integrity, the current BOD made a good start this year already with the new division rules. Finish the other rules and fix our web site and we are there.
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
June 18, 2012 06:41AM
So you may get a pile of discs for winning pro and wanting to stay an am status, but according to Eric cannot win a basket full of moon pies? And I still don't understand why a player can turn cash down and receive plastic for going adv to open, but if an int players adv and places, that player must leave with nothing.

Terry Zeringue
Re: Minutes for 5/2/12 Meeting
June 18, 2012 12:05PM
The rules are clear that an advanced classified player can play Open, win, accept a basket full of moon pies instead of cash if offered by the TD, and retain Am status as long as the player doesn't do that twice in a 6 month period. A Pro classified player who accepts moon pies for their finish is still a Pro for at least 4 more tournaments. The rules preserve the cash = pro distinction, but the benefit of the prizes in lieu rule is debatable. Personally, I've never seen it happen but I imagine it has and it is entirely up to the TD whether or not to offer prizes in lieu of cash.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 8
Record Number of Users: 19 on January 14, 2013
Record Number of Guests: 244 on February 20, 2013