Alabama   •   Arkansas   •   Florida   •   Georgia   •   Kentucky   •   Louisiana   •   Mississippi   •   Oklahoma   •   Tennessee   •   Texas
Welcome! » Log In » Create A New Profile

PIGS AND THE PREZ

Posted by misterbogey 
PIGS AND THE PREZ
June 02, 2010 12:14PM
Last Tuesday, as President Obama got off the helicopter in front of
the White House, he was carrying a baby piglet under each arm.
The squared away Marine guard snaps to attention, salutes and says:

"Nice pigs, sir."

The President replies: "These are not pigs...these are authentic
Arkansas Razorback Hogs. I got one for Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton, and I got one for Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi."

The squared away Marine again snaps to attention, salutes and says,

"Excellent trade, sir."
Re: PIGS AND THE PREZ
June 02, 2010 05:14PM
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

___________________________________________________________________________
Keith "Sunshine" B.
Rumble in Ragley, version 1.0
15 November 2014
Field limited to 90 players
[www.facebook.com]
Re: PIGS AND THE PREZ
June 02, 2010 09:01PM
I find that offensive......HAHA

"HOGMAN"
HyZer Nation
Re: PIGS AND THE PREZ
June 02, 2010 09:23PM
It is offensive...to the pigs! ;-P
Re: PIGS AND THE PREZ
August 30, 2010 04:15PM
Clinton inherited a $290 billion deficit from George H.W. Bush. He reversed Bush's and Reagan's trickle down economic policies, raising taxes on the wealthy, and reducing them on the working and middle classes. He was able to reduce the deficit every single year of his presidency. By 1997, the government was running budgetary surpluses, the first since 1969. He delivered a $230 billion surplus in 2000.

Bush reversed Clinton's policies, lowering taxes on the very wealthy - his "base" as he called them - and effectively raising them on everyone else. In his first full year at the helm of the economy, he delivered a $157 billion deficit, and he never looked back. By 2004, the deficits were topping $400 billion a year. While Clinton delivered surpluses, Bush's deficits totaled some $3.7 trillion over his eight-year term. Clinton 6: Bush 0.

There is no subtlety, no ambiguity about the data or the economic performance they reveal. By every single measure, Bush's policies and tenure were worse - much worse - for the American economy and the American people than those pursued by Bill Clinton. And we are still living today in the aftermath of the destruction they have wrought.

We could add any number of other measures as well, measures not offered up by Forbes but which are still straightforward indices of economic performance. Clinton reduced poverty, from 15.1% when he took office to 11.3% when he left. Bush increased it, from 11.3% when he started to 12.5% at the end of 2008.

The stock market more than tripled under Clinton's tenure. The Dow went from 3,241 when he took office to 10,587 on the day he left. It actually declined under Bush's tenure, from 10,587 on the day he took office to 8,281 on the day he left. Between the recent stock market collapse and the housing crash, Bush destroyed more than $14 trillion in consumer wealth, a staggering, almost incomprehensible legacy of devastation that will haunt Americans for decades to come.

Forbes Magazine, cbo.gov

take it up with them if you disagree.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

kch
Guests: 5
Record Number of Users: 19 on January 14, 2013
Record Number of Guests: 244 on February 20, 2013