Alabama •
Arkansas •
Florida •
Georgia •
Kentucky •
Louisiana •
Mississippi •
Oklahoma •
Tennessee •
Texas
Show all posts by user
Page 1 of 3
Pages: 123
Results 1 - 30 of 76
steven c Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Honestly I don't look on here cause of lames like
> i won't mention names but they hide behind there
> screen and when confronted they deny deny deny
> @Ryan bluff and Keith will always cry no matter
> what I just learned to not give a @#$%& in La
> cause of all the @#$%& and crying and dow
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
There are already apps that can download course information, including distances and pars, from various sources: 1) Discasaurus is a very elegant app for IOS (it sucks for Android right now because its so buggy) that downloads course information including pars and distances and saves and publishes scores on the web so they can be accessed from any device and you can see how others are scoring at
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
Certainly sounds interesting. I like the idea confining Worst Shot to one hole. The partner's bag thing seems a little gimmicky to me, but I guess all doubles formats have that quality to a certain extent.
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
Glad to see this, I go to this area at least twice per month.
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
"Multernate"? "Alternate Mulligan" sounds a little better to me, but not much.
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
I just thought of another modification. The Worst Shot format could also be folded into this format by allowing the other team to determine whether the second throw must be taken. Under that scenario, if taken, the second throw must be used, even if it turned out to be a better throw. This would allow the opposing team to attempt to eliminate a really good shot. To promote speed of play, a second
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
The favorite doubles format discussion and a round of Alt Shot got me thinking about a way to mix Best Shot with Alt Shot and maybe end up with something that plays faster than Best Shot but doesn't suck as bad as Alt Shot. Anyway the idea is to use the alternate shot format but allow the second player to throw as an option. However, the twist is that if the second shot is taken, it must be used.
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
There will always be people who parse the rules and ignore their purpose and insist that without a technical violation, punishment should not be meted out. Perhaps what the rules need is a "commerce clause" type statement to discourage attempts to game the rules in the future - something to the effect of:
"The purpose of the these rules is to insure, to the extent possible, comp
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
It would be nice if the rule was changed to reflect not that a player has not only "not accept" a finishing award but that the player "did not qualify for a finishing award, whether accepted or not." Seriously, what difference does it make if a person accepts the award if they played well enough to get one. Under the new rule, all you have to do is let the TD keep your second
by
Jazzcaster
-
SN Board of Directors
Quotetherefore if only the water is OB, then the tree above the water is technically not OB, because by that rule if you hit a dry patch in the ditch, it's not OB
No OB for the tournaments is probably the best way to go. But if the water is OB, a disc that is in the tree above the water is also OB - technically and otherwise.
BTW, I'm betting on some water for at least 4 months. We're worki
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
Bluff Magee Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Please tell me those rules are not posted at Fort
> Buhlow...did I read that wrong?
No, you read it right. This is a shot of the rules sign at the first tee:
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
Bluff Magee Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jazzcaster, I hope that is an old sign from the
> DGA that you have and not the one posted at the
> new course at Ft. Buhlow. It is an interesting
> look into past rules.
>
> You said I only partly answered your questions but
> you didn't tell me what didn't get answered. Let
> us know
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
Bluff Magee Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Did that answer your questions?
Partly. What this is helping with most is prompting me to make sure that I ask such questions of the TD on tournament days. Incidentally, I think that the water was declared OB instead of the ditch because the border of the ditch is ill-defined. Better to call the water OB and
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
Bluff Magee Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> All water on a course is considered casual unless
> declared OB by the TD. It appears that the TD
> declared that the water in the ditch to be OB. The
> water outside the ditch would still be casual
> then, even if it is touching the water that is in
> the ditch.
>
> It is a fuzzy area
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
The mosquitos are already starting to get bad. Competitors will need a lot of this, especially for the glow round!
by
Jazzcaster
-
SN Tournament Information
Eric Day Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 1. Yes. Position and Verticality rules; 802.02. C.
> and 804.04 E.
>
> This isn't always the case though, I have seen
> several holes where there is a playing surface
> above an OB hazard.
On the very hole where both the situations occurred, there is a bridge that crosses the stream. I'm guess
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
Eric Day Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 1, if the tree itself is in bounds, You should
> take a meter relief from the O.B. line without a
> O.B. penalty. The disc was never out of bounds,
> just on the brink of falling O.B.
>
> If I am way off it has been a little while since I
> have read the rule book, but I trust this falls
>
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
Here are two scenarios that have recently occurred:
1. Disc comes to rest in a tree above a ditch. The water in the ditch has been ruled by the Director to be OB. The disc is clearly, directly and completely above the water. Is the disc OB?
2. Same ditch with water that is considered OB now has water outside it's banks due to recent rain. Disc lands in water a significant distance from the
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
Discjazz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jazzcaster
> I agree with both of your last two posts except my
> suggestion of "mark" instead of "marker" was only
> for the purpose of avoiding relatively remote
> confusion possibility via a literal reading rather
> than that the rule is actually inaccurate as
> written.
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
Okay, so maybe, on a putt, that distance might matter but one of the primary reasons that I don't say anything is that you get the same 22cm or so "advantage" by putting down the mini marker, which will just result in slower play.
I get and agree with your point about following the rules and insisting that others do so as well to ensure fair competition. I guess this just seems like
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
Discjazz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> On a side note, I think use of the term "marker"
> was poor drafting since it is clear we don't have
> to use a marker. They could have just used "mark"
> and solved that problem. However I think that
> side note is irrelevant to this issue.
How can you not use a marker other th
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
Yep, old rulebook. But I think the ket to the "playing surface" definition is the phrase "generally the ground" along with the word "reasonably." I suggest that it is unreasonable to climb a tree and attempt to take a stance therein and that the "playing surface" should be considered to be the ground in the event that you find your disc in a tree.
But &q
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
There is a more specific rule:
"803.08 Disc Above Or Below the Playing Surface:
A. If a disc comes to rest above the playing surface in a tree or other obstacle on the course, its lie shall be marked on the playing surface directly below it. If the point directly below the disc above the playing surface is an out-of-bounds area, the disc shall be declared out-of-bounds and marked and pen
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
I'll check with the City about any curfew. I know there are noise ordinances (10:00 p.m.) but am not sure about anything else.
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
CajunWarrior33 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> its accually easier to find your disc when its
> darker outside because the glow from the disc or
> the LED is illuminated more.
I wondered about that. I was thinking (idle speculation on my part) that on a woods course, it might actually be easier to see the course with moonlight. Do you use flashli
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
Just a suggestion for future scheduling, but you might want to consider scheduling the night golf on dates at or near a full moon. Of course, I have never played at night and am only guessing that this would help. Also, Martin Park Park is pretty wide open has some lighting from the 911 center and might make a good night golf location, unless the pit bull gets loose.
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
No problem. We got back early and would have played anyway.
by
Jazzcaster
-
General Discussion
Page 1 of 3
Pages: 123